- Company Name
- CaptivateIQ
- Job Title
- Senior Product Manager
- Job Description
-
<think>
Okay, let me tackle this query. The user wants to normalize a job description into a concise mini-job profile for job matching. The key points are to exclude company details, location, benefits, and fluff, keeping it under 500 words. The output should be structured with specific sections: Job Title, Role Summary, Expectations, Key Responsibilities, Required Skills, and Required Education & Certifications.
First, I need to read through the original job description carefully. The job title is "Senior Product Manager" but looking at the responsibilities and requirements, there's mention of "Staff / Principal Product Manager – Platform". However, the user might have intended to keep the job title as "Senior Product Manager" per the input, but maybe need to adjust if the role is more senior. The example uses "Staff / Principal", but the user's instruction might prioritize the given title. I'll stick with the provided Job Title unless instructed otherwise.
Next, the Role Summary should capture the essence of the role concisely. The original mentions owning platform capabilities like Identity & Access Management and Compliance. So the summary needs to highlight strategy, roadmap, and execution for core account/platform capabilities.
Expectations: This likely refers to the must-haves or what the company expects from the candidate. The original lists "Must haves," which include experience, skills, etc. So, this section should list the required years of experience, product management focus areas, technical skills, leadership in cross-functional work, communication, and delivery of SaaS platforms.
Key Responsibilities: The user provided several sections here like Product Strategy & Vision, Customer Advocacy, etc. I need to condense these into bullet points that are concise and cover the main tasks. For example, translating customer needs into roadmaps, leading cross-functional initiatives, writing clear requirements, etc.
Required Skills: The original lists technical fluency, product management experience, leadership in complex projects, communication, etc. Need to rephrase these into concise points without the fluff.
Required Education & Certifications: The job description doesn't mention specific degrees or certifications, so maybe leave this as "Not specified" or omit if allowed. However, the user's instruction says to include it, so perhaps check the original. The original does not list education or certifications, so that section can be omitted, but the user's example includes it. Wait, the user's example output would have those fields. Since there's no mention of required education or certs in the provided description, but the user's instruction says to include it, I might need to put "Not specified" or leave it blank. However, since the user wants it factually, perhaps just exclude if not present. But in the original example given by the user, maybe they included that. Let me check the sample again.
Looking back, the user wants to output only the specified fields. The original job description doesn't mention education or certifications, so maybe those sections can be left out. However, the user's instruction says to include them. Hmm. Wait, the user's instruction says: "Required Education & Certifications". The original job description does not list any, so perhaps those sections can be omitted. But maybe the user expects placeholders. Let me check the example again. The user provided their own example, so if there's no info, maybe just leave those sections out or state "Not specified". However, in the given job description, there's a "Must haves" section that mentions experience but not education or certs. So for the Required Education & Certifications, it's not specified. Therefore, in the output, maybe just skip those sections. Wait, but the user's instruction says to output the fields even if empty? No, the user says to exclude benefits, fluff, and company details, so if education and certifications are not mentioned, perhaps those sections can be omitted. However, the user's example might expect them. Let me check the user's own example. In the job description provided, there's no mention of education or certifications, so in that case, perhaps Required Education & Certifications can be left as blank or excluded. However, the user's instruction says to output all the sections. Hmm. Wait, the user says: "Output only: Job title, Role Summary, Expectations, Key Responsibilities, Required Skills, Required Education & Certifications." So even if there's no info, those sections should be present. But in the given job description, there's no education or certifications, so those would be empty. But perhaps in the output, they can be omitted. However, the user's example might require them. This is a bit ambiguous, but given the user's instruction to exclude fluff, and the job description doesn't specify education or certifications, maybe it's acceptable to omit those sections. However, I need to be precise. Let me recheck the user's instruction: "Exclude company details, location, benefits, or fluff." Education and certifications are not mentioned in the job description, so they should be excluded unless they can be inferred from the text. Since they are not present, perhaps those sections can be omitted. However, the user's example in their instructions may expect them. Alternatively, maybe the user wants those sections to be present even if they are empty. To be safe, include them and leave them blank if no info. But in the given job description, perhaps there's no data. So the Required Education & Certifications can be left as "Not specified" or omitted. However, the user might prefer it to be included. Since the instruction says "Output only: Job title, Role Summary, Expectations, Key Responsibilities, Required Skills, Required Education & Certifications." I must include all these sections. Therefore, even if the job description doesn't mention education or certifications, I should include the line. For example, if not present, perhaps write "No specific education or certifications required." But the job does require experience. However, the user says "Exclude company details, location, benefits, or fluff." So if the job description doesn't mention education or certifications, I shouldn't make them up. Therefore, perhaps those sections can be omitted, but the user's instruction says to include them. This is a bit of a dilemma. The safest approach is to include them as empty or with "Not specified." Let me check the example again. The user's example might not have those, but according to the instructions, I need to include all the sections. So in the given job description, since there's no mention, I can write "Not specified" or just leave it empty. But perhaps in the context of the job's "Must haves," there's experience in certain areas but no education. Therefore, in Required Education & Certifications, it's not specified, so we can leave those sections as empty. Alternatively, perhaps the user expects to have those sections filled with relevant info even if it's not there. Hmm. Well, since the user's example in the job description doesn't list any education or certifications, I'll proceed to include those sections as "Not specified" but maybe not include them if the user's instruction allows. However, the user's instruction says to output those sections. Therefore, even if they are not present, I need to include them. For example:
Required Education & Certifications: Not specified.
But maybe the user prefers to exclude those if there's no info. However, the user's instruction says to output all six sections. Therefore, I need to include them. Therefore, in this case, I'll include the section with "Not specified."
Now, compiling the sections:
Job Title: Senior Product Manager
Role Summary: Own and execute platform strategy for Identity & Access Management and Compliance, ensuring secure and scalable systems. Translate customer, regulatory, and business needs into product roadmaps. Lead cross-functional teams to build enterprise-ready features.
Expectations:
- 8+ years product management experience in platform, infrastructure, or technical products
- Strong technical fluency for system design collaboration
- Proven leadership in cross-functional initiatives without direct authority
- Excellent communication skills in high-risk problem spaces
- Track record of scalable SaaS platform delivery
- Direct experience with IAM, compliance, security
Key Responsibilities:
- Define long-term vision/strategy for IAM and compliance
- Translate input into prioritized product roadmap
- Anticipate scale, enterprise, ecosystem needs into platform investments
- Advocate for customer needs, identify platform gaps risking adoption
- Improve platform consistency, reuse, developer experience
- Lead discovery and delivery with engineering/design
- Write clear product requirements balancing security/usability
- Manage tradeoffs between short-term needs and long-term platform health
- Ensure high-quality delivery via backlog management, sequencing
- Collaborate with Engineering, Customer Success, Sales, Support to align and unblock deals
Required Skills:
- Technical fluency, system design
- Cross-functional project leadership
- Clear communication for complex issues
- Roadmap prioritization
- Platform development in SaaS
Required Education & Certifications: Not specified.
Wait, the user's instruction says to exclude fluff. So perhaps the "Not specified" can be omitted if no info is present. But according to the user's instruction, all sections must be present. So even if there's no data, include them. So the final output includes all the required sections. Therefore, Required Education & Certifications: Not specified.
Wait, but in the job description, under "Must haves" there's no mention of education or certifications. So in the output, include that as "Not specified".
Now, check for conciseness. Make sure it's under 500 words. Let me count. The Role Summary is concise. Expectations are bullet points. Key Responsibilities are bullet points. Required Skills are concise. Education is a short line.
I think that meets the requirements. Also, ensure the language is factual, concise, ATS-friendly, globally neutral. Avoid any company-specific details, locations, benefits. All the sections